A Million Green Ideas

Japan admits there radioactive leaks and recognizes that there may be cracks in the reactor vessel. -Denies the possibility of a leak uncontrollably. – The Japanese nuclear agency seeks help from an expert committee of the UN and the US. “The plant evacuated most of its workers to the risk of leakage,The alarm is growing around the Fukushima nuclear plant was affected in four of its reactors by the earthquake that devastated the country on Friday. A fire has broken out in the reactor 4, while in 2 there was an explosion at around six o’clock local,The Japanese government admits that “may have been a leak of radioactive material.” The situation has created great alarm in the country on television announcers constantly repeating messages that appear out of a B movie about a nuclear catastrophe: “Close the windows, no ventilation and use a clothesline at home.” Meanwhile, the French Embassy in Tokyo has recommended to its nationals living in the capital who do not go outside because the wind blowing into the country could be dragged to where the radioactive particles. Previously a government spokesman had acknowledged for the first time that the reactor containment vessel 2 can be cracked, but ensures that the containment building, the last wall before the release, and whose strength depends on that Fukushima is not Chernobyl-no has been damaged, ruling out the possibility of a leak of radioactivity in large dimensions. However, the increasing pollution in the area and the …
Video Rating: 4 / 5

is global climate change real?

A leading British climate scientist has come under pressure to resign over a series of leaked e-mails, which global warming sceptics say point to a mass conspiracy. The scandal erupted after a research server was hacked into, and private e-mails and documents were released, suggesting that scientists may have colluded to prevent the release of climate data.

This video, the second in the series, looks at alternative hypotheses explaining global warming. I am only looking at alternative hypotheses put forward by real, professional climate researchers, and the findings of real, professional climate researchers who disagree with them. Yes, I’ve left a lot of the detail out. This is a 10-minute video summarizing the arguments and counter-arguments, not a PhD thesis. The comments forum will be free and open, as always, but if you disagree with what real, professional climate scientists say, please take it up with them and dont expect me to defend their point of view. If you have a stunning piece of scientific evidence that disproves one side or the other, dont waste time on my channel, write a paper, and get it peer-reviewed and published in a reputable journal. PLEASE NOTE — ERROR — I quoted from an Oreskes Paper and incorrectly stated that nearly 700 papers “explicitely endorsed the view that man-made gases are responsible. This should read that these papers “explicitly or implicity endorsed the view that man-made gases are responsible.” The papers that “implicitly” implied it were those that dealt with effects or mitigation measures. The original should not have been in quotation marks either. My apologies for the error.

How often do you work with other 13F like in a COLT team? How often do you actually call fore fire in a real situation? Do you ever collect intel and do recon? Do you do grunt work? Are you ostracized by the 11Bs?

Best reply by redleg:

As a new 13F, 9 times out of 10 you will be assigned as the RTO (radio operator) to a maneuver (Infantry or Armor) platoon FIST (fire support team). You and a 13F senior SPC or SGT will be responsible for planning and executing the maneuver platoon’s fire plan. You will work directly with the Platoon leader nd Platoon Sergeant (along with your FIST leader and NCO) to accomplish this task. And your Infantry brethren by and large will look at you as another grunt with a special set of skills (and who also knows how to operate a radio and a GPS)

Read the original question here
What is the work environment in the Army as a 13F?